Mean State

Download Data
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg]
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg]
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg]
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg]
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg]
Bias [kg m-2]
Bias Score [1]
Spatial Distribution Score [1]
Overall Score [1]
Benchmark [-] 38.7
CESM2_1_001 [-] 48.0 48.6 0.213 38.7 0.0457 2.55 0.668 0.866 0.767
CESM2_1_002 [-] 47.8 48.4 0.212 38.7 0.0457 2.51 0.668 0.866 0.767
CESM2_1_003 [-] 47.9 48.5 0.212 38.7 0.0457 2.52 0.667 0.865 0.766
CRUJRA [-] 49.0 49.7 0.214 38.7 0.0457 2.81 0.667 0.864 0.766
GSWP3 [-] 38.6 38.8 0.203 38.7 0.0457 0.312 0.774 0.951 0.863
LENS1 [-] 70.9 72.2 0.316 38.7 0.0457 7.92 0.428 0.570 0.499
LENS10 [-] 69.9 71.1 0.317 38.7 0.0457 7.69 0.437 0.582 0.509
LENS5 [-] 70.4 71.7 0.320 38.7 0.0457 7.81 0.432 0.576 0.504
PRINCETON [-] 52.4 53.4 0.220 38.7 0.0457 3.65 0.630 0.833 0.732
Download Data
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg]
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg]
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg]
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg]
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg]
Bias [kg m-2]
Bias Score [1]
Spatial Distribution Score [1]
Overall Score [1]
Benchmark [-] 11.9
CESM2_1_001 [-] 4.43 3.84 0.0294 11.9 0.0196 -1.19 0.467 0.782 0.624
CESM2_1_002 [-] 4.51 3.92 0.0300 11.9 0.0196 -1.18 0.470 0.785 0.628
CESM2_1_003 [-] 4.46 3.88 0.0302 11.9 0.0196 -1.19 0.468 0.784 0.626
CRUJRA [-] 6.29 5.58 0.0492 11.9 0.0196 -0.936 0.504 0.820 0.662
GSWP3 [-] 3.23 2.83 0.0442 11.9 0.0196 -1.35 0.453 0.593 0.523
LENS1 [-] 14.9 13.7 0.0314 11.9 0.0196 0.254 0.550 0.597 0.573
LENS10 [-] 14.8 13.6 0.0306 11.9 0.0196 0.239 0.550 0.602 0.576
LENS5 [-] 14.8 13.6 0.0314 11.9 0.0196 0.242 0.548 0.599 0.573
PRINCETON [-] 6.98 5.98 0.0451 11.9 0.0196 -0.873 0.491 0.792 0.642
Download Data
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg]
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg]
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg]
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg]
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg]
Bias [kg m-2]
Bias Score [1]
Spatial Distribution Score [1]
Overall Score [1]
Benchmark [-] 24.6
CESM2_1_001 [-] 20.9 20.2 0.348 24.5 0.0612 -0.330 0.532 0.682 0.607
CESM2_1_002 [-] 20.2 19.5 0.343 24.5 0.0612 -0.410 0.531 0.695 0.613
CESM2_1_003 [-] 20.0 19.2 0.342 24.5 0.0612 -0.434 0.529 0.692 0.611
CRUJRA [-] 25.6 24.8 0.410 24.5 0.0612 0.197 0.537 0.637 0.587
GSWP3 [-] 12.1 11.5 0.368 24.5 0.0612 -1.22 0.505 0.797 0.651
LENS1 [-] 23.2 22.0 0.585 24.5 0.0612 -0.0546 0.548 0.497 0.522
LENS10 [-] 23.2 22.1 0.578 24.5 0.0612 -0.0493 0.549 0.501 0.525
LENS5 [-] 23.7 22.5 0.587 24.5 0.0612 0.00228 0.555 0.502 0.529
PRINCETON [-] 22.0 21.2 0.413 24.5 0.0612 -0.177 0.536 0.665 0.601
Download Data
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg]
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg]
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg]
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg]
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg]
Bias [kg m-2]
Bias Score [1]
Spatial Distribution Score [1]
Overall Score [1]
Benchmark [-] 36.8
CESM2_1_001 [-] 45.7 43.5 2.02 35.7 1.10 7.14 0.649 0.935 0.792
CESM2_1_002 [-] 45.8 43.6 2.03 35.7 1.10 7.20 0.649 0.936 0.792
CESM2_1_003 [-] 45.8 43.6 2.03 35.7 1.10 7.18 0.648 0.935 0.791
CRUJRA [-] 45.6 43.2 2.10 35.7 1.10 7.28 0.672 0.930 0.801
GSWP3 [-] 39.8 37.8 1.80 35.7 1.10 5.12 0.716 0.918 0.817
LENS1 [-] 69.8 65.6 3.73 35.7 1.10 17.4 0.394 0.877 0.635
LENS10 [-] 70.1 65.9 3.77 35.7 1.10 17.6 0.391 0.866 0.628
LENS5 [-] 71.5 67.2 3.87 35.7 1.10 18.2 0.380 0.859 0.619
PRINCETON [-] 50.3 47.8 2.17 35.7 1.10 8.88 0.607 0.927 0.767
Download Data
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg]
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg]
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg]
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg]
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg]
Bias [kg m-2]
Bias Score [1]
Spatial Distribution Score [1]
Overall Score [1]
Benchmark [-] 38.4
CESM2_1_001 [-] 34.2 23.3 11.8 38.3 0.0891 -1.52 0.613 0.851 0.732
CESM2_1_002 [-] 34.4 23.4 11.9 38.3 0.0891 -1.51 0.614 0.852 0.733
CESM2_1_003 [-] 33.7 23.2 11.4 38.3 0.0891 -1.54 0.612 0.851 0.731
CRUJRA [-] 37.3 24.0 14.2 38.3 0.0891 -1.38 0.553 0.712 0.632
GSWP3 [-] 32.4 23.8 9.37 38.3 0.0891 -1.45 0.587 0.793 0.690
LENS1 [-] 49.3 34.2 15.4 38.3 0.0891 0.0753 0.609 0.654 0.631
LENS10 [-] 48.9 33.8 15.5 38.3 0.0891 0.0201 0.611 0.659 0.635
LENS5 [-] 49.2 34.3 15.3 38.3 0.0891 0.0867 0.609 0.652 0.630
PRINCETON [-] 48.8 32.3 17.8 38.3 0.0891 -0.222 0.601 0.682 0.641
Download Data
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg]
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg]
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg]
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg]
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg]
Bias [kg m-2]
Bias Score [1]
Spatial Distribution Score [1]
Overall Score [1]
Benchmark [-] 43.7
CESM2_1_001 [-] 24.7 23.2 0.675 43.4 0.257 -1.94 0.593 0.878 0.736
CESM2_1_002 [-] 24.7 23.2 0.670 43.4 0.257 -1.95 0.594 0.880 0.737
CESM2_1_003 [-] 24.7 23.3 0.670 43.4 0.257 -1.95 0.596 0.881 0.738
CRUJRA [-] 30.6 29.2 0.739 43.4 0.257 -1.05 0.631 0.876 0.753
GSWP3 [-] 25.0 23.5 0.673 43.4 0.257 -1.94 0.608 0.890 0.749
LENS1 [-] 30.4 28.5 0.903 43.4 0.257 -0.709 0.588 0.728 0.658
LENS10 [-] 30.6 28.7 0.924 43.4 0.257 -0.644 0.586 0.716 0.651
LENS5 [-] 31.1 29.2 0.932 43.4 0.257 -0.564 0.587 0.711 0.649
PRINCETON [-] 32.7 31.0 0.750 43.4 0.257 -0.764 0.638 0.865 0.752
Download Data
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg]
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg]
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg]
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg]
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg]
Bias [kg m-2]
Bias Score [1]
Spatial Distribution Score [1]
Overall Score [1]
Benchmark [-] 13.7
CESM2_1_001 [-] 11.7 4.30 7.27 13.5 0.139 -1.28 0.459 0.598 0.528
CESM2_1_002 [-] 12.1 4.53 7.42 13.5 0.139 -1.24 0.463 0.580 0.521
CESM2_1_003 [-] 12.0 4.41 7.42 13.5 0.139 -1.27 0.461 0.591 0.526
CRUJRA [-] 12.8 5.45 7.09 13.5 0.139 -1.08 0.484 0.584 0.534
GSWP3 [-] 11.0 3.66 7.17 13.5 0.139 -1.38 0.444 0.636 0.540
LENS1 [-] 10.7 3.88 6.64 13.5 0.139 -1.42 0.467 0.604 0.535
LENS10 [-] 10.4 3.68 6.52 13.5 0.139 -1.46 0.460 0.610 0.535
LENS5 [-] 10.8 3.84 6.76 13.5 0.139 -1.43 0.464 0.598 0.531
PRINCETON [-] 14.2 5.70 8.31 13.5 0.139 -1.01 0.463 0.472 0.468
Download Data
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg]
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg]
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg]
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg]
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg]
Bias [kg m-2]
Bias Score [1]
Spatial Distribution Score [1]
Overall Score [1]
Benchmark [-] 352.
CESM2_1_001 [-] 486. 328. 158. 348. 3.81 0.331 0.614 0.819 0.716
CESM2_1_002 [-] 487. 329. 158. 348. 3.81 0.341 0.613 0.816 0.715
CESM2_1_003 [-] 486. 328. 158. 348. 3.81 0.323 0.613 0.817 0.715
CRUJRA [-] 626. 394. 232. 348. 3.81 1.36 0.579 0.756 0.668
GSWP3 [-] 490. 310. 181. 348. 3.81 0.0772 0.638 0.853 0.746
LENS1 [-] 552. 450. 102. 348. 3.81 2.36 0.522 0.582 0.552
LENS10 [-] 552. 451. 101. 348. 3.81 2.37 0.520 0.579 0.550
LENS5 [-] 554. 452. 102. 348. 3.81 2.41 0.521 0.575 0.548
PRINCETON [-] 714. 420. 294. 348. 3.81 1.75 0.567 0.729 0.648
Download Data
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg]
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg]
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg]
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg]
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg]
Bias [kg m-2]
Bias Score [1]
Spatial Distribution Score [1]
Overall Score [1]
Benchmark [-] 2.53
CESM2_1_001 [-] 1.14 0.220 0.939 2.53 0.00250 -1.04 0.399 0.0286 0.214
CESM2_1_002 [-] 1.18 0.240 0.959 2.53 0.00250 -1.03 0.402 0.0333 0.217
CESM2_1_003 [-] 1.15 0.230 0.939 2.53 0.00250 -1.04 0.400 0.0309 0.216
CRUJRA [-] 1.92 0.288 1.62 2.53 0.00250 -1.01 0.400 0.0297 0.215
GSWP3 [-] 1.59 0.213 1.39 2.53 0.00250 -1.04 0.395 0.0215 0.208
LENS1 [-] 1.20 0.193 1.02 2.53 0.00250 -1.05 0.388 0.0241 0.206
LENS10 [-] 1.14 0.186 0.966 2.53 0.00250 -1.05 0.386 0.0236 0.205
LENS5 [-] 1.16 0.185 0.979 2.53 0.00250 -1.05 0.387 0.0232 0.205
PRINCETON [-] 2.28 0.263 2.01 2.53 0.00250 -1.02 0.401 0.0322 0.216
Download Data
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg]
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg]
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg]
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg]
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg]
Bias [kg m-2]
Bias Score [1]
Spatial Distribution Score [1]
Overall Score [1]
Benchmark [-] 11.1
CESM2_1_001 [-] 9.83 9.15 0.448 10.9 0.149 0.516 0.602 0.832 0.717
CESM2_1_002 [-] 9.93 9.25 0.452 10.9 0.149 0.568 0.610 0.835 0.723
CESM2_1_003 [-] 10.0 9.32 0.454 10.9 0.149 0.585 0.604 0.830 0.717
CRUJRA [-] 12.4 11.5 0.591 10.9 0.149 1.72 0.567 0.701 0.634
GSWP3 [-] 10.2 9.43 0.548 10.9 0.149 0.831 0.607 0.774 0.691
LENS1 [-] 14.0 13.2 0.483 10.9 0.149 1.86 0.506 0.629 0.567
LENS10 [-] 13.7 13.0 0.468 10.9 0.149 1.76 0.507 0.634 0.570
LENS5 [-] 13.7 13.0 0.471 10.9 0.149 1.76 0.508 0.641 0.575
PRINCETON [-] 13.7 12.8 0.623 10.9 0.149 2.13 0.558 0.692 0.625
Download Data
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg]
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg]
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg]
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg]
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg]
Bias [kg m-2]
Bias Score [1]
Spatial Distribution Score [1]
Overall Score [1]
Benchmark [-] 1.55
CESM2_1_001 [-] 9.51 1.37 8.06 1.52 0.0247 0.411 0.500 0.583 0.542
CESM2_1_002 [-] 9.55 1.36 8.11 1.52 0.0247 0.400 0.501 0.586 0.544
CESM2_1_003 [-] 9.47 1.35 8.03 1.52 0.0247 0.385 0.502 0.592 0.547
CRUJRA [-] 18.0 3.74 14.2 1.52 0.0247 3.78 0.488 0.524 0.506
GSWP3 [-] 11.9 1.28 10.5 1.52 0.0247 0.374 0.548 0.689 0.619
LENS1 [-] 18.7 2.87 15.6 1.52 0.0247 2.70 0.547 0.628 0.588
LENS10 [-] 18.5 2.78 15.6 1.52 0.0247 2.57 0.543 0.628 0.585
LENS5 [-] 18.6 2.80 15.6 1.52 0.0247 2.60 0.546 0.632 0.589
PRINCETON [-] 19.2 3.80 15.2 1.52 0.0247 3.89 0.476 0.499 0.487
Download Data
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg]
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg]
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg]
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg]
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg]
Bias [kg m-2]
Bias Score [1]
Spatial Distribution Score [1]
Overall Score [1]
Benchmark [-] 0.219
CESM2_1_001 [-] 1.65 0.0965 1.57 0.219 -0.393 0.488 0.205 0.346
CESM2_1_002 [-] 1.66 0.0991 1.58 0.219 -0.386 0.490 0.246 0.368
CESM2_1_003 [-] 1.68 0.0988 1.60 0.219 -0.386 0.496 0.242 0.369
CRUJRA [-] 3.43 0.124 3.35 0.219 -0.311 0.519 0.219 0.369
GSWP3 [-] 3.12 0.0823 3.07 0.219 -0.440 0.466 0.0843 0.275
LENS1 [-] 4.00 0.176 3.90 0.219 -0.161 0.551 0.307 0.429
LENS10 [-] 3.92 0.153 3.84 0.219 -0.228 0.540 0.226 0.383
LENS5 [-] 3.94 0.155 3.85 0.219 -0.224 0.531 0.240 0.386
PRINCETON [-] 6.92 0.0851 6.86 0.219 -0.430 0.482 0.164 0.323
Download Data
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg]
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg]
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg]
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg]
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg]
Bias [kg m-2]
Bias Score [1]
Spatial Distribution Score [1]
Overall Score [1]
Benchmark [-] 100.
CESM2_1_001 [-] 130. 129. 0.323 100. 0.0690 3.73 0.662 0.848 0.755
CESM2_1_002 [-] 131. 130. 0.324 100. 0.0690 3.86 0.658 0.844 0.751
CESM2_1_003 [-] 130. 129. 0.326 100. 0.0690 3.79 0.660 0.845 0.753
CRUJRA [-] 163. 162. 0.427 100. 0.0690 7.69 0.552 0.825 0.689
GSWP3 [-] 128. 128. 0.396 100. 0.0690 3.64 0.709 0.919 0.814
LENS1 [-] 160. 159. 0.382 100. 0.0690 7.36 0.540 0.610 0.575
LENS10 [-] 162. 161. 0.389 100. 0.0690 7.59 0.532 0.606 0.569
LENS5 [-] 160. 159. 0.374 100. 0.0690 7.35 0.539 0.607 0.573
PRINCETON [-] 168. 167. 0.454 100. 0.0690 8.29 0.535 0.827 0.681
Download Data
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg]
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg]
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg]
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg]
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg]
Bias [kg m-2]
Bias Score [1]
Spatial Distribution Score [1]
Overall Score [1]
Benchmark [-] 18.4
CESM2_1_001 [-] 13.6 13.7 0.250 18.4 0.0281 -0.496 0.608 0.779 0.693
CESM2_1_002 [-] 13.3 13.5 0.235 18.4 0.0281 -0.541 0.602 0.773 0.687
CESM2_1_003 [-] 13.4 13.5 0.234 18.4 0.0281 -0.532 0.607 0.778 0.693
CRUJRA [-] 28.3 28.4 0.368 18.4 0.0281 1.74 0.541 0.633 0.587
GSWP3 [-] 21.9 21.8 0.347 18.4 0.0281 0.741 0.546 0.579 0.562
LENS1 [-] 22.2 23.0 0.198 18.4 0.0281 0.870 0.568 0.400 0.484
LENS10 [-] 22.4 23.3 0.202 18.4 0.0281 0.910 0.571 0.401 0.486
LENS5 [-] 22.4 23.3 0.200 18.4 0.0281 0.916 0.570 0.400 0.485
PRINCETON [-] 29.9 30.1 0.397 18.4 0.0281 2.01 0.530 0.594 0.562
Download Data
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg]
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg]
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg]
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg]
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg]
Bias [kg m-2]
Bias Score [1]
Spatial Distribution Score [1]
Overall Score [1]
Benchmark [-] 7.28
CESM2_1_001 [-] 7.17 7.07 0.125 7.15 0.128 0.452 0.585 0.653 0.619
CESM2_1_002 [-] 7.25 7.15 0.127 7.15 0.128 0.480 0.585 0.650 0.618
CESM2_1_003 [-] 7.17 7.08 0.127 7.15 0.128 0.456 0.586 0.655 0.620
CRUJRA [-] 5.19 5.07 0.150 7.15 0.128 0.145 0.511 0.527 0.519
GSWP3 [-] 6.26 6.15 0.145 7.15 0.128 0.390 0.526 0.568 0.547
LENS1 [-] 10.6 10.1 0.0923 7.15 0.128 1.30 0.509 0.404 0.457
LENS10 [-] 10.5 9.94 0.0911 7.15 0.128 1.26 0.500 0.400 0.450
LENS5 [-] 10.6 10.1 0.0918 7.15 0.128 1.30 0.507 0.401 0.454
PRINCETON [-] 7.47 7.39 0.135 7.15 0.128 0.845 0.508 0.511 0.510

Temporally integrated period mean

BENCHMARK MEAN
Data not available
Data not available
MODEL MEAN
Data not available
Data not available
BIAS
Data not available
Data not available
BIAS SCORE
Data not available
Data not available

Spatially integrated regional mean

MODEL COLORS
Data not available

All Models

Benchmark
Data not available
Data not available
CESM2_1_001
Data not available
Data not available
CESM2_1_002
Data not available
Data not available
CESM2_1_003
Data not available
Data not available
CRUJRA
Data not available
Data not available
GSWP3
Data not available
Data not available
LENS1
Data not available
Data not available
LENS10
Data not available
Data not available
LENS5
Data not available
Data not available
PRINCETON
Data not available
Data not available

Data Information

  Title:
Global Tropical Forest Biomass

  Institution:
NASA-JPL (NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91109, USA)

  Source:
4079 in situ inventory plots, satellite light detection and ranging (LiDAR) samples of forest structure, and optical and microwave imagery (1-km resolution) to extrapolate estimates

  History:
2015-01-08-T06:37:41Z Converted from 1 km x 1 km to 0.5 degree x 0.5 degree by Mingquan Mu (mmu@uci.edu) on Fri Jan 9 10:37:41 PST 2015

  References:
Saatchi, S. S., N. L. Harris, S. Brown, M. Lefsky, E. T. A. Mitchard, W. Salas, B. R. Zutta, W. Buermann, S. L. Lewis, S. Hagen, S. Petrova, L. White, M. Silman, and A. Morel (2011), Benchmark map of forest carbon stocks in tropical regions across three continents, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 108(24):9899-9904, doi:10.1073/pnas.1019576108.

  Conventions:
CF-1.6

  Institute_id:
NASA-JPL

  Creation_date:
2015-01-08-T06:37:41Z

  Product:
observations

  Data_structure:
grid

  Realm:
land

  Contact:
Prof. James T. Randerson (jranders@uci.edu) or Dr. Mingquan Mu (mmu@uci.edu)