Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 38.7 | ||||||||||
CLM4 | [-] | 49.5 | 50.3 | 0.175 | 38.7 | 0.0457 | 2.84 | 0.647 | 0.812 | 0.729 | ||
CLM4.5 | [-] | 45.4 | 45.4 | 0.214 | 38.7 | 0.0457 | 1.81 | 0.606 | 0.776 | 0.691 | ||
CLM5 | [-] | 38.5 | 38.7 | 0.202 | 38.7 | 0.0457 | 0.293 | 0.774 | 0.952 | 0.863 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 11.9 | ||||||||||
CLM4 | [-] | 7.62 | 6.82 | 0.00883 | 11.9 | 0.0196 | -0.754 | 0.580 | 0.883 | 0.731 | ||
CLM4.5 | [-] | 2.26 | 2.02 | 0.0241 | 11.9 | 0.0196 | -1.47 | 0.428 | 0.379 | 0.404 | ||
CLM5 | [-] | 3.25 | 2.85 | 0.0430 | 11.9 | 0.0196 | -1.35 | 0.454 | 0.594 | 0.524 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 24.6 | ||||||||||
CLM4 | [-] | 10.9 | 10.4 | 0.239 | 24.5 | 0.0612 | -1.42 | 0.526 | 0.842 | 0.684 | ||
CLM4.5 | [-] | 4.94 | 4.60 | 0.227 | 24.5 | 0.0612 | -2.04 | 0.441 | 0.697 | 0.569 | ||
CLM5 | [-] | 12.3 | 11.7 | 0.367 | 24.5 | 0.0612 | -1.21 | 0.507 | 0.799 | 0.653 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 36.8 | ||||||||||
CLM4 | [-] | 62.7 | 60.1 | 2.37 | 35.7 | 1.10 | 12.8 | 0.454 | 0.682 | 0.568 | ||
CLM4.5 | [-] | 54.1 | 51.6 | 2.16 | 35.7 | 1.10 | 10.3 | 0.535 | 0.872 | 0.703 | ||
CLM5 | [-] | 39.9 | 37.9 | 1.80 | 35.7 | 1.10 | 5.14 | 0.715 | 0.918 | 0.817 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 38.4 | ||||||||||
CLM4 | [-] | 40.6 | 30.7 | 10.5 | 38.3 | 0.0891 | -0.539 | 0.580 | 0.644 | 0.612 | ||
CLM4.5 | [-] | 40.9 | 30.9 | 10.3 | 38.3 | 0.0891 | -0.477 | 0.530 | 0.603 | 0.567 | ||
CLM5 | [-] | 31.6 | 23.2 | 9.15 | 38.3 | 0.0891 | -1.53 | 0.586 | 0.801 | 0.694 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 43.7 | ||||||||||
CLM4 | [-] | 28.1 | 26.8 | 0.491 | 43.4 | 0.257 | -1.57 | 0.607 | 0.856 | 0.731 | ||
CLM4.5 | [-] | 22.9 | 21.6 | 0.572 | 43.4 | 0.257 | -2.15 | 0.527 | 0.785 | 0.656 | ||
CLM5 | [-] | 24.8 | 23.2 | 0.670 | 43.4 | 0.257 | -1.98 | 0.606 | 0.890 | 0.748 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 13.7 | ||||||||||
CLM4 | [-] | 7.61 | 1.66 | 5.85 | 13.5 | 0.139 | -1.85 | 0.418 | 0.581 | 0.499 | ||
CLM4.5 | [-] | 7.63 | 1.55 | 6.01 | 13.5 | 0.139 | -1.85 | 0.413 | 0.544 | 0.479 | ||
CLM5 | [-] | 11.0 | 3.66 | 7.16 | 13.5 | 0.139 | -1.38 | 0.445 | 0.638 | 0.541 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 352. | ||||||||||
CLM4 | [-] | 467. | 376. | 90.9 | 348. | 3.81 | 0.986 | 0.539 | 0.628 | 0.583 | ||
CLM4.5 | [-] | 452. | 327. | 125. | 348. | 3.81 | 0.359 | 0.537 | 0.704 | 0.621 | ||
CLM5 | [-] | 486. | 309. | 178. | 348. | 3.81 | 0.0653 | 0.638 | 0.854 | 0.746 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 2.53 | ||||||||||
CLM4 | [-] | 1.32 | 0.117 | 1.21 | 2.53 | 0.00250 | -1.09 | 0.385 | 0.0111 | 0.198 | ||
CLM4.5 | [-] | 1.34 | 0.119 | 1.24 | 2.53 | 0.00250 | -1.08 | 0.385 | 0.0203 | 0.203 | ||
CLM5 | [-] | 1.55 | 0.211 | 1.35 | 2.53 | 0.00250 | -1.04 | 0.395 | 0.0211 | 0.208 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 11.1 | ||||||||||
CLM4 | [-] | 4.64 | 4.09 | 0.284 | 10.9 | 0.149 | -1.52 | 0.455 | 0.665 | 0.560 | ||
CLM4.5 | [-] | 8.47 | 7.78 | 0.434 | 10.9 | 0.149 | 0.0277 | 0.535 | 0.684 | 0.610 | ||
CLM5 | [-] | 10.2 | 9.38 | 0.547 | 10.9 | 0.149 | 0.813 | 0.607 | 0.775 | 0.691 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 1.55 | ||||||||||
CLM4 | [-] | 13.4 | 2.27 | 11.0 | 1.52 | 0.0247 | 1.54 | 0.638 | 0.767 | 0.703 | ||
CLM4.5 | [-] | 14.7 | 1.63 | 12.9 | 1.52 | 0.0247 | 0.864 | 0.600 | 0.764 | 0.682 | ||
CLM5 | [-] | 11.9 | 1.32 | 10.5 | 1.52 | 0.0247 | 0.434 | 0.550 | 0.683 | 0.617 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 0.219 | ||||||||||
CLM4 | [-] | 3.99 | 0.100 | 3.95 | 0.219 | -0.388 | 0.491 | 0.192 | 0.341 | |||
CLM4.5 | [-] | 2.99 | 0.0814 | 2.95 | 0.219 | -0.445 | 0.467 | 0.128 | 0.297 | |||
CLM5 | [-] | 3.04 | 0.0844 | 2.99 | 0.219 | -0.433 | 0.468 | 0.0819 | 0.275 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 100. | ||||||||||
CLM4 | [-] | 159. | 158. | 0.331 | 100. | 0.0690 | 7.20 | 0.511 | 0.493 | 0.502 | ||
CLM4.5 | [-] | 141. | 141. | 0.404 | 100. | 0.0690 | 5.17 | 0.585 | 0.674 | 0.630 | ||
CLM5 | [-] | 128. | 128. | 0.396 | 100. | 0.0690 | 3.63 | 0.709 | 0.919 | 0.814 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 18.4 | ||||||||||
CLM4 | [-] | 17.8 | 17.9 | 0.122 | 18.4 | 0.0281 | 0.0899 | 0.547 | 0.530 | 0.539 | ||
CLM4.5 | [-] | 13.5 | 13.4 | 0.195 | 18.4 | 0.0281 | -0.573 | 0.515 | 0.570 | 0.543 | ||
CLM5 | [-] | 21.8 | 21.8 | 0.347 | 18.4 | 0.0281 | 0.735 | 0.546 | 0.579 | 0.563 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 7.28 | ||||||||||
CLM4 | [-] | 4.80 | 5.04 | 0.0866 | 7.15 | 0.128 | -0.164 | 0.492 | 0.496 | 0.494 | ||
CLM4.5 | [-] | 5.00 | 5.06 | 0.113 | 7.15 | 0.128 | -0.0225 | 0.468 | 0.509 | 0.488 | ||
CLM5 | [-] | 6.25 | 6.14 | 0.145 | 7.15 | 0.128 | 0.387 | 0.524 | 0.568 | 0.546 |
title: Global Tropical Forest Biomass
institution: NASA-JPL (NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91109, USA)
institute_id: NASA-JPL
source: 4079 in situ inventory plots, satellite light detection and ranging (LiDAR) samples of forest structure, and optical and microwave imagery (1-km resolution) to extrapolate estimates
history: 2015-01-08-T06:37:41Z Converted from 1 km x 1 km to 0.5 degree x 0.5 degree by Mingquan Mu (mmu@uci.edu) on Fri Jan 9 10:37:41 PST 2015
creation_date: 2015-01-08-T06:37:41Z
Conventions: CF-1.6
product: observations
data_structure: grid
realm: land
contact: Prof. James T. Randerson (jranders@uci.edu) or Dr. Mingquan Mu (mmu@uci.edu)
references: Saatchi, S. S., N. L. Harris, S. Brown, M. Lefsky, E. T. A. Mitchard, W. Salas, B. R. Zutta, W. Buermann, S. L. Lewis, S. Hagen, S. Petrova, L. White, M. Silman, and A. Morel (2011), Benchmark map of forest carbon stocks in tropical regions across three continents, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 108(24):9899-9904, doi:10.1073/pnas.1019576108.