Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 38.7 | ||||||||||
CESM2_1_001 | [-] | 50.3 | 50.1 | 0.842 | 38.7 | 0.0457 | 2.55 | 0.67 | 0.87 | 0.77 | ||
CESM2_1_002 | [-] | 50.1 | 49.9 | 0.839 | 38.7 | 0.0457 | 2.51 | 0.67 | 0.87 | 0.77 | ||
CESM2_1_003 | [-] | 50.2 | 49.9 | 0.840 | 38.7 | 0.0457 | 2.52 | 0.67 | 0.86 | 0.77 | ||
LENS1 | [-] | 70.9 | 72.2 | 0.316 | 38.7 | 0.0457 | 7.92 | 0.43 | 0.57 | 0.50 | ||
LENS10 | [-] | 73.0 | 73.0 | 1.28 | 38.7 | 0.0457 | 7.69 | 0.44 | 0.58 | 0.51 | ||
LENS5 | [-] | 73.6 | 73.6 | 1.29 | 38.7 | 0.0457 | 7.81 | 0.43 | 0.58 | 0.50 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 11.9 | ||||||||||
CESM2_1_001 | [-] | 4.50 | 3.91 | 0.0486 | 11.9 | 0.0196 | -1.19 | 0.47 | 0.78 | 0.62 | ||
CESM2_1_002 | [-] | 4.58 | 3.99 | 0.0490 | 11.9 | 0.0196 | -1.18 | 0.47 | 0.79 | 0.63 | ||
CESM2_1_003 | [-] | 4.54 | 3.95 | 0.0495 | 11.9 | 0.0196 | -1.19 | 0.47 | 0.78 | 0.63 | ||
LENS1 | [-] | 14.9 | 13.7 | 0.0314 | 11.9 | 0.0196 | 0.254 | 0.55 | 0.60 | 0.57 | ||
LENS10 | [-] | 14.8 | 13.6 | 0.0431 | 11.9 | 0.0196 | 0.239 | 0.55 | 0.60 | 0.58 | ||
LENS5 | [-] | 14.8 | 13.6 | 0.0441 | 11.9 | 0.0196 | 0.242 | 0.55 | 0.60 | 0.57 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 24.6 | ||||||||||
CESM2_1_001 | [-] | 23.4 | 21.6 | 1.20 | 24.5 | 0.0612 | -0.330 | 0.53 | 0.68 | 0.61 | ||
CESM2_1_002 | [-] | 22.6 | 20.9 | 1.17 | 24.5 | 0.0612 | -0.410 | 0.53 | 0.69 | 0.61 | ||
CESM2_1_003 | [-] | 22.4 | 20.7 | 1.18 | 24.5 | 0.0612 | -0.434 | 0.53 | 0.69 | 0.61 | ||
LENS1 | [-] | 23.2 | 22.0 | 0.585 | 24.5 | 0.0612 | -0.0546 | 0.55 | 0.50 | 0.52 | ||
LENS10 | [-] | 26.6 | 24.3 | 1.49 | 24.5 | 0.0612 | -0.0493 | 0.55 | 0.50 | 0.53 | ||
LENS5 | [-] | 27.1 | 24.8 | 1.53 | 24.5 | 0.0612 | 0.00228 | 0.56 | 0.50 | 0.53 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 36.8 | ||||||||||
CESM2_1_001 | [-] | 71.3 | 60.6 | 8.80 | 35.7 | 1.10 | 7.14 | 0.65 | 0.94 | 0.79 | ||
CESM2_1_002 | [-] | 71.6 | 60.8 | 8.85 | 35.7 | 1.10 | 7.20 | 0.65 | 0.94 | 0.79 | ||
CESM2_1_003 | [-] | 71.5 | 60.7 | 8.84 | 35.7 | 1.10 | 7.18 | 0.65 | 0.93 | 0.79 | ||
LENS1 | [-] | 69.8 | 65.6 | 3.73 | 35.7 | 1.10 | 17.4 | 0.39 | 0.88 | 0.64 | ||
LENS10 | [-] | 117. | 96.9 | 16.5 | 35.7 | 1.10 | 17.6 | 0.39 | 0.87 | 0.63 | ||
LENS5 | [-] | 119. | 99.0 | 17.0 | 35.7 | 1.10 | 18.2 | 0.38 | 0.86 | 0.62 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 38.4 | ||||||||||
CESM2_1_001 | [-] | 41.5 | 27.0 | 14.8 | 38.3 | 0.0891 | -1.52 | 0.61 | 0.85 | 0.73 | ||
CESM2_1_002 | [-] | 41.8 | 27.0 | 14.9 | 38.3 | 0.0891 | -1.51 | 0.61 | 0.85 | 0.73 | ||
CESM2_1_003 | [-] | 41.1 | 26.8 | 14.5 | 38.3 | 0.0891 | -1.54 | 0.61 | 0.85 | 0.73 | ||
LENS1 | [-] | 49.3 | 34.2 | 15.4 | 38.3 | 0.0891 | 0.0753 | 0.61 | 0.65 | 0.63 | ||
LENS10 | [-] | 58.9 | 38.8 | 19.5 | 38.3 | 0.0891 | 0.0201 | 0.61 | 0.66 | 0.64 | ||
LENS5 | [-] | 59.3 | 39.3 | 19.4 | 38.3 | 0.0891 | 0.0867 | 0.61 | 0.65 | 0.63 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 43.7 | ||||||||||
CESM2_1_001 | [-] | 34.6 | 29.9 | 3.08 | 43.4 | 0.257 | -1.94 | 0.59 | 0.88 | 0.74 | ||
CESM2_1_002 | [-] | 34.5 | 29.9 | 3.06 | 43.4 | 0.257 | -1.95 | 0.59 | 0.88 | 0.74 | ||
CESM2_1_003 | [-] | 34.5 | 29.8 | 3.06 | 43.4 | 0.257 | -1.95 | 0.60 | 0.88 | 0.74 | ||
LENS1 | [-] | 30.4 | 28.5 | 0.903 | 43.4 | 0.257 | -0.709 | 0.59 | 0.73 | 0.66 | ||
LENS10 | [-] | 46.0 | 39.3 | 4.24 | 43.4 | 0.257 | -0.644 | 0.59 | 0.72 | 0.65 | ||
LENS5 | [-] | 46.6 | 39.9 | 4.29 | 43.4 | 0.257 | -0.564 | 0.59 | 0.71 | 0.65 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 13.7 | ||||||||||
CESM2_1_001 | [-] | 18.7 | 5.46 | 12.7 | 13.5 | 0.139 | -1.28 | 0.46 | 0.60 | 0.53 | ||
CESM2_1_002 | [-] | 19.3 | 5.72 | 13.0 | 13.5 | 0.139 | -1.24 | 0.46 | 0.58 | 0.52 | ||
CESM2_1_003 | [-] | 19.0 | 5.56 | 12.9 | 13.5 | 0.139 | -1.27 | 0.46 | 0.59 | 0.53 | ||
LENS1 | [-] | 10.7 | 3.88 | 6.64 | 13.5 | 0.139 | -1.42 | 0.47 | 0.60 | 0.54 | ||
LENS10 | [-] | 16.3 | 4.38 | 11.3 | 13.5 | 0.139 | -1.46 | 0.46 | 0.61 | 0.54 | ||
LENS5 | [-] | 16.9 | 4.56 | 11.7 | 13.5 | 0.139 | -1.43 | 0.46 | 0.60 | 0.53 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 352. | ||||||||||
CESM2_1_001 | [-] | 578. | 373. | 205. | 348. | 3.81 | 0.331 | 0.61 | 0.82 | 0.72 | ||
CESM2_1_002 | [-] | 579. | 374. | 206. | 348. | 3.81 | 0.341 | 0.61 | 0.82 | 0.71 | ||
CESM2_1_003 | [-] | 578. | 372. | 206. | 348. | 3.81 | 0.323 | 0.61 | 0.82 | 0.72 | ||
LENS1 | [-] | 552. | 450. | 102. | 348. | 3.81 | 2.36 | 0.52 | 0.58 | 0.55 | ||
LENS10 | [-] | 670. | 517. | 153. | 348. | 3.81 | 2.37 | 0.52 | 0.58 | 0.55 | ||
LENS5 | [-] | 674. | 520. | 154. | 348. | 3.81 | 2.41 | 0.52 | 0.58 | 0.55 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 2.53 | ||||||||||
CESM2_1_001 | [-] | 1.43 | 0.226 | 1.19 | 2.53 | 0.00250 | -1.04 | 0.40 | 0.029 | 0.21 | ||
CESM2_1_002 | [-] | 1.47 | 0.247 | 1.21 | 2.53 | 0.00250 | -1.03 | 0.40 | 0.033 | 0.22 | ||
CESM2_1_003 | [-] | 1.44 | 0.238 | 1.19 | 2.53 | 0.00250 | -1.04 | 0.40 | 0.031 | 0.22 | ||
LENS1 | [-] | 1.20 | 0.193 | 1.02 | 2.53 | 0.00250 | -1.05 | 0.39 | 0.024 | 0.21 | ||
LENS10 | [-] | 1.40 | 0.201 | 1.19 | 2.53 | 0.00250 | -1.05 | 0.39 | 0.024 | 0.20 | ||
LENS5 | [-] | 1.42 | 0.199 | 1.21 | 2.53 | 0.00250 | -1.05 | 0.39 | 0.023 | 0.20 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 11.1 | ||||||||||
CESM2_1_001 | [-] | 14.9 | 12.6 | 1.67 | 10.9 | 0.149 | 0.516 | 0.60 | 0.83 | 0.72 | ||
CESM2_1_002 | [-] | 15.1 | 12.8 | 1.70 | 10.9 | 0.149 | 0.568 | 0.61 | 0.83 | 0.72 | ||
CESM2_1_003 | [-] | 15.2 | 12.8 | 1.70 | 10.9 | 0.149 | 0.585 | 0.60 | 0.83 | 0.72 | ||
LENS1 | [-] | 14.0 | 13.2 | 0.483 | 10.9 | 0.149 | 1.86 | 0.51 | 0.63 | 0.57 | ||
LENS10 | [-] | 18.7 | 16.5 | 1.58 | 10.9 | 0.149 | 1.76 | 0.51 | 0.63 | 0.57 | ||
LENS5 | [-] | 18.8 | 16.5 | 1.61 | 10.9 | 0.149 | 1.76 | 0.51 | 0.64 | 0.57 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 1.55 | ||||||||||
CESM2_1_001 | [-] | 11.9 | 1.84 | 9.64 | 1.52 | 0.0247 | 0.411 | 0.50 | 0.58 | 0.54 | ||
CESM2_1_002 | [-] | 11.9 | 1.83 | 9.70 | 1.52 | 0.0247 | 0.400 | 0.50 | 0.59 | 0.54 | ||
CESM2_1_003 | [-] | 11.8 | 1.82 | 9.61 | 1.52 | 0.0247 | 0.385 | 0.50 | 0.59 | 0.55 | ||
LENS1 | [-] | 18.7 | 2.87 | 15.6 | 1.52 | 0.0247 | 2.70 | 0.55 | 0.63 | 0.59 | ||
LENS10 | [-] | 21.5 | 3.53 | 17.4 | 1.52 | 0.0247 | 2.57 | 0.54 | 0.63 | 0.59 | ||
LENS5 | [-] | 21.6 | 3.56 | 17.5 | 1.52 | 0.0247 | 2.60 | 0.55 | 0.63 | 0.59 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 0.219 | ||||||||||
CESM2_1_001 | [-] | 2.16 | 0.0965 | 2.20 | 0.219 | 0.00 | -0.393 | 0.49 | 0.20 | 0.35 | ||
CESM2_1_002 | [-] | 2.17 | 0.0991 | 2.20 | 0.219 | 0.00 | -0.386 | 0.49 | 0.25 | 0.37 | ||
CESM2_1_003 | [-] | 2.19 | 0.0988 | 2.22 | 0.219 | 0.00 | -0.386 | 0.50 | 0.24 | 0.37 | ||
LENS1 | [-] | 4.00 | 0.176 | 3.90 | 0.219 | 0.00 | -0.161 | 0.55 | 0.31 | 0.43 | ||
LENS10 | [-] | 4.14 | 0.153 | 4.14 | 0.219 | 0.00 | -0.228 | 0.54 | 0.23 | 0.38 | ||
LENS5 | [-] | 4.15 | 0.155 | 4.14 | 0.219 | 0.00 | -0.224 | 0.53 | 0.24 | 0.39 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 100. | ||||||||||
CESM2_1_001 | [-] | 134. | 132. | 1.53 | 100. | 0.0690 | 3.73 | 0.66 | 0.85 | 0.76 | ||
CESM2_1_002 | [-] | 136. | 133. | 1.54 | 100. | 0.0690 | 3.86 | 0.66 | 0.84 | 0.75 | ||
CESM2_1_003 | [-] | 135. | 133. | 1.54 | 100. | 0.0690 | 3.79 | 0.66 | 0.85 | 0.75 | ||
LENS1 | [-] | 160. | 159. | 0.382 | 100. | 0.0690 | 7.36 | 0.54 | 0.61 | 0.58 | ||
LENS10 | [-] | 168. | 165. | 1.59 | 100. | 0.0690 | 7.59 | 0.53 | 0.61 | 0.57 | ||
LENS5 | [-] | 166. | 163. | 1.54 | 100. | 0.0690 | 7.35 | 0.54 | 0.61 | 0.57 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 18.4 | ||||||||||
CESM2_1_001 | [-] | 16.0 | 15.3 | 0.895 | 18.4 | 0.0281 | -0.496 | 0.61 | 0.78 | 0.69 | ||
CESM2_1_002 | [-] | 15.6 | 15.0 | 0.856 | 18.4 | 0.0281 | -0.541 | 0.60 | 0.77 | 0.69 | ||
CESM2_1_003 | [-] | 15.7 | 15.1 | 0.851 | 18.4 | 0.0281 | -0.532 | 0.61 | 0.78 | 0.69 | ||
LENS1 | [-] | 22.2 | 23.0 | 0.198 | 18.4 | 0.0281 | 0.870 | 0.57 | 0.40 | 0.48 | ||
LENS10 | [-] | 24.6 | 24.8 | 0.707 | 18.4 | 0.0281 | 0.910 | 0.57 | 0.40 | 0.49 | ||
LENS5 | [-] | 24.6 | 24.9 | 0.700 | 18.4 | 0.0281 | 0.916 | 0.57 | 0.40 | 0.49 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 7.28 | ||||||||||
CESM2_1_001 | [-] | 8.80 | 8.42 | 0.415 | 7.15 | 0.128 | 0.452 | 0.58 | 0.65 | 0.62 | ||
CESM2_1_002 | [-] | 8.89 | 8.51 | 0.420 | 7.15 | 0.128 | 0.480 | 0.59 | 0.65 | 0.62 | ||
CESM2_1_003 | [-] | 8.81 | 8.43 | 0.416 | 7.15 | 0.128 | 0.456 | 0.59 | 0.66 | 0.62 | ||
LENS1 | [-] | 10.6 | 10.1 | 0.0923 | 7.15 | 0.128 | 1.30 | 0.51 | 0.40 | 0.46 | ||
LENS10 | [-] | 11.6 | 11.0 | 0.224 | 7.15 | 0.128 | 1.26 | 0.50 | 0.40 | 0.45 | ||
LENS5 | [-] | 11.8 | 11.1 | 0.227 | 7.15 | 0.128 | 1.30 | 0.51 | 0.40 | 0.45 |
title: Global Tropical Forest Biomass
institution: NASA-JPL (NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91109, USA)
institute_id: NASA-JPL
source: 4079 in situ inventory plots, satellite light detection and ranging (LiDAR) samples of forest structure, and optical and microwave imagery (1-km resolution) to extrapolate estimates
history: 2015-01-08-T06:37:41Z Converted from 1 km x 1 km to 0.5 degree x 0.5 degree by Mingquan Mu (mmu@uci.edu) on Fri Jan 9 10:37:41 PST 2015
creation_date: 2015-01-08-T06:37:41Z
Conventions: CF-1.6
product: observations
data_structure: grid
realm: land
contact: Prof. James T. Randerson (jranders@uci.edu) or Dr. Mingquan Mu (mmu@uci.edu)
references: Saatchi, S. S., N. L. Harris, S. Brown, M. Lefsky, E. T. A. Mitchard, W. Salas, B. R. Zutta, W. Buermann, S. L. Lewis, S. Hagen, S. Petrova, L. White, M. Silman, and A. Morel (2011), Benchmark map of forest carbon stocks in tropical regions across three continents, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 108(24):9899-9904, doi:10.1073/pnas.1019576108.