Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 30.1 | ||||||||||
CESM2_1_001 | [-] | 579. | 19.2 | 559. | 29.9 | 0.195 | -1.17 | 0.54 | 0.68 | 0.61 | ||
CESM2_1_002 | [-] | 580. | 19.4 | 560. | 29.9 | 0.195 | -1.16 | 0.54 | 0.68 | 0.61 | ||
CESM2_1_003 | [-] | 579. | 19.3 | 560. | 29.9 | 0.195 | -1.16 | 0.54 | 0.68 | 0.61 | ||
LENS1 | [-] | 552. | 23.1 | 529. | 29.9 | 0.195 | -0.503 | 0.62 | 0.73 | 0.67 | ||
LENS10 | [-] | 669. | 25.0 | 644. | 29.9 | 0.195 | -0.532 | 0.62 | 0.73 | 0.67 | ||
LENS5 | [-] | 674. | 25.1 | 649. | 29.9 | 0.195 | -0.528 | 0.62 | 0.73 | 0.67 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 1.44 | ||||||||||
CESM2_1_001 | [-] | 10.7 | 4.76 | 6.11 | 1.41 | 0.0279 | 2.74 | 0.35 | 0.57 | 0.46 | ||
CESM2_1_002 | [-] | 11.0 | 4.86 | 6.26 | 1.41 | 0.0279 | 2.82 | 0.34 | 0.57 | 0.45 | ||
CESM2_1_003 | [-] | 10.8 | 4.87 | 6.15 | 1.41 | 0.0279 | 2.83 | 0.34 | 0.57 | 0.46 | ||
LENS1 | [-] | 3.40 | 0.533 | 2.80 | 1.41 | 0.0279 | -0.632 | 0.46 | 0.40 | 0.43 | ||
LENS10 | [-] | 3.82 | 0.636 | 3.06 | 1.41 | 0.0279 | -0.638 | 0.46 | 0.40 | 0.43 | ||
LENS5 | [-] | 3.83 | 0.645 | 3.06 | 1.41 | 0.0279 | -0.631 | 0.46 | 0.41 | 0.44 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 0.00649 | ||||||||||
CESM2_1_001 | [-] | 14.9 | 0.0252 | 14.3 | 0.00649 | 0.00 | 0.164 | 0.49 | 0.58 | 0.53 | ||
CESM2_1_002 | [-] | 15.2 | 0.0232 | 14.5 | 0.00649 | 0.00 | 0.146 | 0.48 | 0.56 | 0.52 | ||
CESM2_1_003 | [-] | 15.2 | 0.0241 | 14.5 | 0.00649 | 0.00 | 0.155 | 0.49 | 0.58 | 0.53 | ||
LENS1 | [-] | 13.9 | 0.0271 | 13.7 | 0.00649 | 0.00 | 0.218 | 0.42 | 0.27 | 0.34 | ||
LENS10 | [-] | 18.7 | 0.0262 | 18.0 | 0.00649 | 0.00 | 0.183 | 0.40 | 0.24 | 0.32 | ||
LENS5 | [-] | 18.8 | 0.0254 | 18.1 | 0.00649 | 0.00 | 0.174 | 0.40 | 0.22 | 0.31 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 17.4 | ||||||||||
CESM2_1_001 | [-] | 11.9 | 10.7 | 0.845 | 17.3 | 0.0180 | -1.66 | 0.61 | 0.85 | 0.73 | ||
CESM2_1_002 | [-] | 11.9 | 10.7 | 0.849 | 17.3 | 0.0180 | -1.65 | 0.61 | 0.85 | 0.73 | ||
CESM2_1_003 | [-] | 11.9 | 10.6 | 0.842 | 17.3 | 0.0180 | -1.67 | 0.60 | 0.84 | 0.72 | ||
LENS1 | [-] | 18.8 | 18.2 | 0.339 | 17.3 | 0.0180 | 0.627 | 0.73 | 0.93 | 0.83 | ||
LENS10 | [-] | 21.6 | 19.9 | 1.12 | 17.3 | 0.0180 | 0.585 | 0.72 | 0.93 | 0.83 | ||
LENS5 | [-] | 21.6 | 19.9 | 1.12 | 17.3 | 0.0180 | 0.591 | 0.72 | 0.93 | 0.83 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 1.52 | ||||||||||
CESM2_1_001 | [-] | 38.5 | 1.66 | 36.5 | 1.46 | 0.0621 | 0.725 | 0.64 | 0.83 | 0.73 | ||
CESM2_1_002 | [-] | 38.8 | 1.66 | 36.9 | 1.46 | 0.0621 | 0.700 | 0.63 | 0.82 | 0.73 | ||
CESM2_1_003 | [-] | 38.6 | 1.66 | 36.7 | 1.46 | 0.0621 | 0.696 | 0.64 | 0.82 | 0.73 | ||
LENS1 | [-] | 13.4 | 0.499 | 13.1 | 1.46 | 0.0621 | -3.65 | 0.39 | 0.38 | 0.39 | ||
LENS10 | [-] | 14.8 | 0.540 | 14.4 | 1.46 | 0.0621 | -3.67 | 0.39 | 0.37 | 0.38 | ||
LENS5 | [-] | 14.9 | 0.553 | 14.5 | 1.46 | 0.0621 | -3.62 | 0.39 | 0.38 | 0.39 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 9.78 | ||||||||||
CESM2_1_001 | [-] | 2.17 | 2.03 | 0.265 | 9.71 | 0.0683 | -2.12 | 0.43 | 0.21 | 0.32 | ||
CESM2_1_002 | [-] | 2.17 | 2.04 | 0.263 | 9.71 | 0.0683 | -2.12 | 0.43 | 0.21 | 0.32 | ||
CESM2_1_003 | [-] | 2.19 | 2.06 | 0.266 | 9.71 | 0.0683 | -2.11 | 0.43 | 0.21 | 0.32 | ||
LENS1 | [-] | 4.01 | 3.83 | 0.248 | 9.71 | 0.0683 | -1.55 | 0.48 | 0.12 | 0.30 | ||
LENS10 | [-] | 4.15 | 3.96 | 0.336 | 9.71 | 0.0683 | -1.57 | 0.48 | 0.12 | 0.30 | ||
LENS5 | [-] | 4.13 | 3.95 | 0.329 | 9.71 | 0.0683 | -1.57 | 0.48 | 0.11 | 0.29 |
Approach: To convert the original data at 250m to the final one at 0.5x0.5 degree resolution, Please see conversion steps listed in http://redwood.ess.uci.edu/mingquan/www/ILAMB/Download/CODES/CODES/subroutines/convert/readme_biomass. 3 codes below will be used in these steps. Code 1: http://redwood.ess.uci.edu/mingquan/www/ILAMB/Download/CODES/CODES/subroutines/convert/read-US.Forest.pro Code 2: http://redwood.ess.uci.edu/mingquan/www/ILAMB/Download/CODES/CODES/subroutines/convert/convert-US.Forest.ncl Code 3: http://redwood.ess.uci.edu/mingquan/www/ILAMB/Download/CODES/CODES/subroutines/convert/write-US.Forest.ncl First, I used Code 1 to read data at 250m from the original geotiff file; then I used Code 2 to convert unit from the orignal unit of ton C per hectare to the final one of Kg C per m2, meanwhile I summed all available data points at 250m in each 0.5x0.5 grid cell to obtain the data at 0.5x0.5 degree resolution; finally I used Code 3 to create the final file in netCDF format.
Temporal resolution: yearly
General information: This product was derived from Forest Biomass across the Lower 48 States and Alaska originally in a raster format at 250m.
Spatial resolution: 0.5x0.5 degree
Derived data code: http://redwood.ess.uci.edu/mingquan/www/ILAMB/Download/CODES/CODES/subroutines/convert/read-US.Forest.pro http://redwood.ess.uci.edu/mingquan/www/ILAMB/Download/CODES/CODES/subroutines/convert/convert-US.Forest.ncl http://redwood.ess.uci.edu/mingquan/www/ILAMB/Download/CODES/CODES/subroutines/convert/write-US.Forest.ncl