Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 0.797 | ||||||||||
CLM4 | [-] | 4.03 | 0.578 | 3.14 | 0.538 | 0.0190 | 0.897 | 0.62 | 0.79 | 0.70 | ||
CLM4.5 | [-] | 9.76 | 0.798 | 8.70 | 0.538 | 0.0190 | 1.71 | 0.49 | 0.62 | 0.56 | ||
CLM5 | [-] | 10.2 | 0.768 | 9.20 | 0.538 | 0.0190 | 1.59 | 0.52 | 0.68 | 0.60 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 26.2 | ||||||||||
CLM4 | [-] | 582. | 21.9 | 560. | 26.1 | 0.0878 | -0.299 | 0.63 | 0.85 | 0.74 | ||
CLM4.5 | [-] | 560. | 24.1 | 536. | 26.1 | 0.0878 | 0.0184 | 0.62 | 0.87 | 0.74 | ||
CLM5 | [-] | 589. | 21.7 | 567. | 26.1 | 0.0878 | -0.243 | 0.62 | 0.87 | 0.74 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 25.4 | ||||||||||
CLM4 | [-] | 31.1 | 21.3 | 9.57 | 25.6 | 0.0688 | -0.369 | 0.63 | 0.85 | 0.74 | ||
CLM4.5 | [-] | 35.5 | 23.3 | 11.9 | 25.6 | 0.0688 | -0.0814 | 0.62 | 0.87 | 0.75 | ||
CLM5 | [-] | 35.4 | 21.0 | 14.0 | 25.6 | 0.0688 | -0.351 | 0.62 | 0.88 | 0.75 |
_NCProperties: version=1|netcdflibversion=4.4.1|hdf5libversion=1.8.17
Approach: To convert the original data at 250m to the final one at 0.5x0.5 degree resolution, Please see conversion steps listed in http://redwood.ess.uci.edu/mingquan/www/ILAMB/Download/CODES/CODES/subroutines/convert/readme_biomass. 3 codes below will be used in these steps. Code 1: http://redwood.ess.uci.edu/mingquan/www/ILAMB/Download/CODES/CODES/subroutines/convert/read-NBCD2000.pro Code 2: http://redwood.ess.uci.edu/mingquan/www/ILAMB/Download/CODES/CODES/subroutines/convert/convert-NBCD2000.ncl Code 3: http://redwood.ess.uci.edu/mingquan/www/ILAMB/Download/CODES/CODES/subroutines/convert/write-NBCD2000.ncl First, I used Code 1 to read data at 250m from the original geotiff file; then I used Code 2 to convert unit from the orignal unit of ton C per hectare to the final one of Kg C per m2, meanwhile I summed all available data points at 250m in each 0.5x0.5 grid cell to obtain the data at 0.5x0.5 degree resolution; finally I used Code 3 to create the final file in netCDF format.
Temporal resolution: yearly
General information: This product was derived from National Biomass and Carbon Dataset for the year 2000 originally in a raster format at 250m.
Spatial resolution: 0.5x0.5 degree
Derived data code: http://redwood.ess.uci.edu/mingquan/www/ILAMB/Download/CODES/CODES/subroutines/convert/read-NBCD2000.pro http://redwood.ess.uci.edu/mingquan/www/ILAMB/Download/CODES/CODES/subroutines/convert/convert-NBCD2000.ncl http://redwood.ess.uci.edu/mingquan/www/ILAMB/Download/CODES/CODES/subroutines/convert/write-NBCD2000.ncl