Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 222. | ||||||||||
CLM4.0 | [-] | 51.6 | 34.0 | 17.5 | 224. | 0.348 | -23.4 | 0.0054 | 0.26 | 0.13 | ||
CLM4.5 | [-] | 172. | 128. | 42.0 | 224. | 0.348 | -11.8 | 0.028 | 0.86 | 0.45 | ||
CLM5.0 | [-] | 253. | 193. | 55.9 | 224. | 0.348 | -3.70 | 0.021 | 0.52 | 0.27 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 160. | ||||||||||
CLM4.0 | [-] | 36.6 | 25.6 | 11.1 | 159. | 0.709 | -16.4 | 0.014 | 0.10 | 0.057 | ||
CLM4.5 | [-] | 111. | 88.1 | 23.4 | 159. | 0.709 | -8.36 | 0.026 | 0.67 | 0.35 | ||
CLM5.0 | [-] | 185. | 150. | 35.0 | 159. | 0.709 | -0.549 | 0.024 | 0.69 | 0.36 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 44.9 | ||||||||||
CLM4.0 | [-] | 74.0 | 17.7 | 56.2 | 42.9 | 0.00185 | -9.87 | 0.031 | 0.49 | 0.26 | ||
CLM4.5 | [-] | 112. | 27.1 | 84.4 | 42.9 | 0.00185 | -6.13 | 0.045 | 0.86 | 0.45 | ||
CLM5.0 | [-] | 120. | 28.4 | 90.6 | 42.9 | 0.00185 | -5.66 | 0.045 | 0.88 | 0.46 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 5.18 | ||||||||||
CLM4.0 | [-] | 22.6 | 0.457 | 21.9 | 5.18 | 0.00 | -18.0 | 0.0034 | 0.053 | 0.028 | ||
CLM4.5 | [-] | 54.5 | 2.30 | 51.5 | 5.18 | 0.00 | -11.0 | 0.018 | 0.21 | 0.12 | ||
CLM5.0 | [-] | 50.9 | 3.53 | 46.5 | 5.18 | 0.00 | -6.41 | 0.019 | 0.48 | 0.25 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 475. | ||||||||||
CLM4.0 | [-] | 500. | 79.0 | 421. | 474. | 1.51 | -17.4 | 0.011 | 0.15 | 0.080 | ||
CLM4.5 | [-] | 879. | 275. | 603. | 474. | 1.51 | -8.52 | 0.028 | 0.82 | 0.43 | ||
CLM5.0 | [-] | 1.05e+03 | 433. | 619. | 474. | 1.51 | -1.41 | 0.024 | 0.64 | 0.33 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 0.539 | ||||||||||
CLM4.0 | [-] | 42.9 | 0.430 | 42.3 | 0.523 | 0.00 | -1.35 | 0.14 | 0.44 | 0.29 | ||
CLM4.5 | [-] | 64.4 | 0.513 | 63.6 | 0.523 | 0.00 | -0.338 | 0.15 | 0.74 | 0.44 | ||
CLM5.0 | [-] | 52.8 | 0.851 | 51.7 | 0.523 | 0.00 | 2.69 | 0.083 | 0.70 | 0.39 |
_NCProperties: version=1|netcdflibversion=4.4.1|hdf5libversion=1.8.17
Approach: I just read the data from the original data file and converted the latitude arrange from original 90N->90S to 90S->90N. The unit was convert from original 0.1 KgC/m2 to KgC/m2
Temporal resolution: yearly
General information: This product was derived from Northern Circumpolar Soil Carbon Database V2.2 (NCSCDv22) in top 1m.
Spatial resolution: 0.5x0.5 degree
Derived data code: http://redwood.ess.uci.edu/mingquan/www/ILAMB/Download/CODES/CODES/subroutines/convert/convert-soilc-NCSCDv22.ncl