Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 38.7 | ||||||||||
CLM4 | [-] | 49.5 | 50.3 | 0.175 | 38.7 | 0.0457 | 2.84 | 0.65 | 0.81 | 0.73 | ||
CLM4.5 | [-] | 45.4 | 45.4 | 0.214 | 38.7 | 0.0457 | 1.81 | 0.61 | 0.78 | 0.69 | ||
CLM5 | [-] | 38.5 | 38.7 | 0.202 | 38.7 | 0.0457 | 0.293 | 0.77 | 0.95 | 0.86 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 11.9 | ||||||||||
CLM4 | [-] | 7.62 | 6.82 | 0.00883 | 11.9 | 0.0196 | -0.754 | 0.58 | 0.88 | 0.73 | ||
CLM4.5 | [-] | 2.26 | 2.02 | 0.0241 | 11.9 | 0.0196 | -1.47 | 0.43 | 0.38 | 0.40 | ||
CLM5 | [-] | 3.25 | 2.85 | 0.0430 | 11.9 | 0.0196 | -1.35 | 0.45 | 0.59 | 0.52 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 24.6 | ||||||||||
CLM4 | [-] | 10.9 | 10.4 | 0.239 | 24.5 | 0.0612 | -1.42 | 0.53 | 0.84 | 0.68 | ||
CLM4.5 | [-] | 4.94 | 4.60 | 0.227 | 24.5 | 0.0612 | -2.04 | 0.44 | 0.70 | 0.57 | ||
CLM5 | [-] | 12.3 | 11.7 | 0.367 | 24.5 | 0.0612 | -1.21 | 0.51 | 0.80 | 0.65 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 36.8 | ||||||||||
CLM4 | [-] | 62.7 | 60.1 | 2.37 | 35.7 | 1.10 | 12.8 | 0.45 | 0.68 | 0.57 | ||
CLM4.5 | [-] | 54.1 | 51.6 | 2.16 | 35.7 | 1.10 | 10.3 | 0.53 | 0.87 | 0.70 | ||
CLM5 | [-] | 39.9 | 37.9 | 1.80 | 35.7 | 1.10 | 5.14 | 0.72 | 0.92 | 0.82 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 38.4 | ||||||||||
CLM4 | [-] | 40.6 | 30.7 | 10.5 | 38.3 | 0.0891 | -0.539 | 0.58 | 0.64 | 0.61 | ||
CLM4.5 | [-] | 40.9 | 30.9 | 10.3 | 38.3 | 0.0891 | -0.477 | 0.53 | 0.60 | 0.57 | ||
CLM5 | [-] | 31.6 | 23.2 | 9.15 | 38.3 | 0.0891 | -1.53 | 0.59 | 0.80 | 0.69 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 43.7 | ||||||||||
CLM4 | [-] | 28.1 | 26.8 | 0.491 | 43.4 | 0.257 | -1.57 | 0.61 | 0.86 | 0.73 | ||
CLM4.5 | [-] | 22.9 | 21.6 | 0.572 | 43.4 | 0.257 | -2.15 | 0.53 | 0.79 | 0.66 | ||
CLM5 | [-] | 24.8 | 23.2 | 0.670 | 43.4 | 0.257 | -1.98 | 0.61 | 0.89 | 0.75 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 13.7 | ||||||||||
CLM4 | [-] | 7.61 | 1.66 | 5.85 | 13.5 | 0.139 | -1.85 | 0.42 | 0.58 | 0.50 | ||
CLM4.5 | [-] | 7.63 | 1.55 | 6.01 | 13.5 | 0.139 | -1.85 | 0.41 | 0.54 | 0.48 | ||
CLM5 | [-] | 11.0 | 3.66 | 7.16 | 13.5 | 0.139 | -1.38 | 0.44 | 0.64 | 0.54 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 352. | ||||||||||
CLM4 | [-] | 467. | 376. | 90.9 | 348. | 3.81 | 0.986 | 0.54 | 0.63 | 0.58 | ||
CLM4.5 | [-] | 452. | 327. | 125. | 348. | 3.81 | 0.359 | 0.54 | 0.70 | 0.62 | ||
CLM5 | [-] | 486. | 309. | 178. | 348. | 3.81 | 0.0653 | 0.64 | 0.85 | 0.75 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 2.53 | ||||||||||
CLM4 | [-] | 1.32 | 0.117 | 1.21 | 2.53 | 0.00250 | -1.09 | 0.39 | 0.011 | 0.20 | ||
CLM4.5 | [-] | 1.34 | 0.119 | 1.24 | 2.53 | 0.00250 | -1.08 | 0.39 | 0.020 | 0.20 | ||
CLM5 | [-] | 1.55 | 0.211 | 1.35 | 2.53 | 0.00250 | -1.04 | 0.39 | 0.021 | 0.21 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 11.1 | ||||||||||
CLM4 | [-] | 4.64 | 4.09 | 0.284 | 10.9 | 0.149 | -1.52 | 0.45 | 0.66 | 0.56 | ||
CLM4.5 | [-] | 8.47 | 7.78 | 0.434 | 10.9 | 0.149 | 0.0277 | 0.54 | 0.68 | 0.61 | ||
CLM5 | [-] | 10.2 | 9.38 | 0.547 | 10.9 | 0.149 | 0.813 | 0.61 | 0.77 | 0.69 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 1.55 | ||||||||||
CLM4 | [-] | 13.4 | 2.27 | 11.0 | 1.52 | 0.0247 | 1.54 | 0.64 | 0.77 | 0.70 | ||
CLM4.5 | [-] | 14.7 | 1.63 | 12.9 | 1.52 | 0.0247 | 0.864 | 0.60 | 0.76 | 0.68 | ||
CLM5 | [-] | 11.9 | 1.32 | 10.5 | 1.52 | 0.0247 | 0.434 | 0.55 | 0.68 | 0.62 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 0.219 | ||||||||||
CLM4 | [-] | 3.99 | 0.100 | 3.95 | 0.219 | -0.388 | 0.49 | 0.19 | 0.34 | |||
CLM4.5 | [-] | 2.99 | 0.0814 | 2.95 | 0.219 | -0.445 | 0.47 | 0.13 | 0.30 | |||
CLM5 | [-] | 3.04 | 0.0844 | 2.99 | 0.219 | -0.433 | 0.47 | 0.082 | 0.27 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 100. | ||||||||||
CLM4 | [-] | 159. | 158. | 0.331 | 100. | 0.0690 | 7.20 | 0.51 | 0.49 | 0.50 | ||
CLM4.5 | [-] | 141. | 141. | 0.404 | 100. | 0.0690 | 5.17 | 0.59 | 0.67 | 0.63 | ||
CLM5 | [-] | 128. | 128. | 0.396 | 100. | 0.0690 | 3.63 | 0.71 | 0.92 | 0.81 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 18.4 | ||||||||||
CLM4 | [-] | 17.8 | 17.9 | 0.122 | 18.4 | 0.0281 | 0.0899 | 0.55 | 0.53 | 0.54 | ||
CLM4.5 | [-] | 13.5 | 13.4 | 0.195 | 18.4 | 0.0281 | -0.573 | 0.52 | 0.57 | 0.54 | ||
CLM5 | [-] | 21.8 | 21.8 | 0.347 | 18.4 | 0.0281 | 0.735 | 0.55 | 0.58 | 0.56 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 7.28 | ||||||||||
CLM4 | [-] | 4.80 | 5.04 | 0.0866 | 7.15 | 0.128 | -0.164 | 0.49 | 0.50 | 0.49 | ||
CLM4.5 | [-] | 5.00 | 5.06 | 0.113 | 7.15 | 0.128 | -0.0225 | 0.47 | 0.51 | 0.49 | ||
CLM5 | [-] | 6.25 | 6.14 | 0.145 | 7.15 | 0.128 | 0.387 | 0.52 | 0.57 | 0.55 |
title: Global Tropical Forest Biomass
institution: NASA-JPL (NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91109, USA)
institute_id: NASA-JPL
source: 4079 in situ inventory plots, satellite light detection and ranging (LiDAR) samples of forest structure, and optical and microwave imagery (1-km resolution) to extrapolate estimates
history: 2015-01-08-T06:37:41Z Converted from 1 km x 1 km to 0.5 degree x 0.5 degree by Mingquan Mu (mmu@uci.edu) on Fri Jan 9 10:37:41 PST 2015
creation_date: 2015-01-08-T06:37:41Z
Conventions: CF-1.6
product: observations
data_structure: grid
realm: land
contact: Prof. James T. Randerson (jranders@uci.edu) or Dr. Mingquan Mu (mmu@uci.edu)
references: Saatchi, S. S., N. L. Harris, S. Brown, M. Lefsky, E. T. A. Mitchard, W. Salas, B. R. Zutta, W. Buermann, S. L. Lewis, S. Hagen, S. Petrova, L. White, M. Silman, and A. Morel (2011), Benchmark map of forest carbon stocks in tropical regions across three continents, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 108(24):9899-9904, doi:10.1073/pnas.1019576108.