Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 26.2 | ||||||||||
CLM4 | [-] | 582. | 21.9 | 560. | 26.1 | 0.0878 | -0.299 | 0.63 | 0.85 | 0.74 | ||
CLM4.5 | [-] | 560. | 24.1 | 536. | 26.1 | 0.0878 | 0.0184 | 0.62 | 0.87 | 0.74 | ||
CLM5 | [-] | 589. | 21.7 | 567. | 26.1 | 0.0878 | -0.243 | 0.62 | 0.87 | 0.74 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 0.00338 | ||||||||||
CLM4 | [-] | 5.39 | 0.00986 | 5.08 | 0.00338 | 0.00 | 0.0933 | 0.62 | 0.68 | 0.65 | ||
CLM4.5 | [-] | 11.4 | 0.0180 | 11.1 | 0.00338 | 0.00 | 0.232 | 0.36 | 0.30 | 0.33 | ||
CLM5 | [-] | 11.9 | 0.0255 | 11.6 | 0.00338 | 0.00 | 0.302 | 0.36 | 0.40 | 0.38 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 17.5 | ||||||||||
CLM4 | [-] | 16.4 | 16.0 | 0.266 | 17.4 | 0.0333 | -0.0421 | 0.67 | 0.91 | 0.79 | ||
CLM4.5 | [-] | 20.4 | 19.9 | 0.326 | 17.4 | 0.0333 | 0.973 | 0.68 | 0.90 | 0.79 | ||
CLM5 | [-] | 17.8 | 17.4 | 0.303 | 17.4 | 0.0333 | 0.386 | 0.67 | 0.91 | 0.79 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 0.222 | ||||||||||
CLM4 | [-] | 25.1 | 0.735 | 24.5 | 0.222 | 0.00 | 6.06 | 0.35 | 0.40 | 0.37 | ||
CLM4.5 | [-] | 34.8 | 0.804 | 34.2 | 0.222 | 0.00 | 6.81 | 0.33 | 0.46 | 0.40 | ||
CLM5 | [-] | 56.8 | 0.907 | 56.1 | 0.222 | 0.00 | 8.04 | 0.29 | 0.39 | 0.34 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 8.47 | ||||||||||
CLM4 | [-] | 5.11 | 5.12 | 0.0325 | 8.42 | 0.0520 | -0.736 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.57 | ||
CLM4.5 | [-] | 3.42 | 3.42 | 0.0387 | 8.42 | 0.0520 | -1.16 | 0.49 | 0.37 | 0.43 | ||
CLM5 | [-] | 3.49 | 3.46 | 0.0505 | 8.42 | 0.0520 | -1.12 | 0.51 | 0.70 | 0.60 |
Approach: To convert the original data at 250m to the final one at 0.5x0.5 degree resolution, Please see conversion steps listed in http://redwood.ess.uci.edu/mingquan/www/ILAMB/Download/CODES/CODES/subroutines/convert/readme_biomass. 3 codes below will be used in these steps. Code 1: http://redwood.ess.uci.edu/mingquan/www/ILAMB/Download/CODES/CODES/subroutines/convert/read-NBCD2000.pro Code 2: http://redwood.ess.uci.edu/mingquan/www/ILAMB/Download/CODES/CODES/subroutines/convert/convert-NBCD2000.ncl Code 3: http://redwood.ess.uci.edu/mingquan/www/ILAMB/Download/CODES/CODES/subroutines/convert/write-NBCD2000.ncl First, I used Code 1 to read data at 250m from the original geotiff file; then I used Code 2 to convert unit from the orignal unit of ton C per hectare to the final one of Kg C per m2, meanwhile I summed all available data points at 250m in each 0.5x0.5 grid cell to obtain the data at 0.5x0.5 degree resolution; finally I used Code 3 to create the final file in netCDF format.
Temporal resolution: yearly
General information: This product was derived from National Biomass and Carbon Dataset for the year 2000 originally in a raster format at 250m.
Spatial resolution: 0.5x0.5 degree
Derived data code: http://redwood.ess.uci.edu/mingquan/www/ILAMB/Download/CODES/CODES/subroutines/convert/read-NBCD2000.pro http://redwood.ess.uci.edu/mingquan/www/ILAMB/Download/CODES/CODES/subroutines/convert/convert-NBCD2000.ncl http://redwood.ess.uci.edu/mingquan/www/ILAMB/Download/CODES/CODES/subroutines/convert/write-NBCD2000.ncl