Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 26.2 | ||||||||||
CESM2_1 | [-] | 487. | 11.3 | 475. | 26.1 | 0.0878 | -1.58 | 0.548 | 0.705 | 0.626 | ||
CRUJRA | [-] | 626. | 21.9 | 604. | 26.1 | 0.0878 | -0.225 | 0.626 | 0.879 | 0.753 | ||
GSWP3 | [-] | 491. | 15.4 | 475. | 26.1 | 0.0878 | -1.07 | 0.598 | 0.789 | 0.694 | ||
PRINCETON | [-] | 714. | 26.6 | 688. | 26.1 | 0.0878 | 0.352 | 0.649 | 0.895 | 0.772 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 0.00338 | ||||||||||
CESM2_1 | [-] | 9.84 | 0.0225 | 9.59 | 0.00338 | 0.281 | 0.268 | 0.379 | 0.324 | |||
CRUJRA | [-] | 12.4 | 0.0328 | 12.1 | 0.00338 | 0.460 | 0.213 | 0.231 | 0.222 | |||
GSWP3 | [-] | 10.2 | 0.0258 | 9.96 | 0.00338 | 0.332 | 0.264 | 0.355 | 0.309 | |||
PRINCETON | [-] | 13.7 | 0.0283 | 13.4 | 0.00338 | 0.377 | 0.257 | 0.286 | 0.271 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 17.5 | ||||||||||
CESM2_1 | [-] | 9.53 | 9.26 | 0.194 | 17.4 | 0.0333 | -1.69 | 0.599 | 0.870 | 0.735 | ||
CRUJRA | [-] | 18.0 | 17.6 | 0.288 | 17.4 | 0.0333 | 0.438 | 0.688 | 0.928 | 0.808 | ||
GSWP3 | [-] | 11.9 | 11.6 | 0.234 | 17.4 | 0.0333 | -1.09 | 0.647 | 0.882 | 0.764 | ||
PRINCETON | [-] | 19.2 | 18.8 | 0.305 | 17.4 | 0.0333 | 0.728 | 0.684 | 0.914 | 0.799 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 0.222 | ||||||||||
CESM2_1 | [-] | 35.2 | 0.369 | 34.6 | 0.222 | 2.19 | 0.483 | 0.642 | 0.563 | |||
CRUJRA | [-] | 53.4 | 0.823 | 52.6 | 0.222 | 7.05 | 0.301 | 0.461 | 0.381 | |||
GSWP3 | [-] | 44.5 | 0.608 | 44.1 | 0.222 | 4.70 | 0.409 | 0.634 | 0.521 | |||
PRINCETON | [-] | 67.0 | 0.926 | 66.1 | 0.222 | 8.24 | 0.263 | 0.379 | 0.321 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 8.47 | ||||||||||
CESM2_1 | [-] | 1.65 | 1.64 | 0.0355 | 8.42 | 0.0520 | -1.60 | 0.441 | 0.294 | 0.368 | ||
CRUJRA | [-] | 3.44 | 3.42 | 0.0606 | 8.42 | 0.0520 | -1.12 | 0.505 | 0.667 | 0.586 | ||
GSWP3 | [-] | 3.12 | 3.12 | 0.0350 | 8.42 | 0.0520 | -1.21 | 0.502 | 0.547 | 0.525 | ||
PRINCETON | [-] | 6.93 | 6.90 | 0.0567 | 8.42 | 0.0520 | -0.244 | 0.588 | 0.865 | 0.727 |
Approach: To convert the original data at 250m to the final one at 0.5x0.5 degree resolution, Please see conversion steps listed in http://redwood.ess.uci.edu/mingquan/www/ILAMB/Download/CODES/CODES/subroutines/convert/readme_biomass. 3 codes below will be used in these steps. Code 1: http://redwood.ess.uci.edu/mingquan/www/ILAMB/Download/CODES/CODES/subroutines/convert/read-NBCD2000.pro Code 2: http://redwood.ess.uci.edu/mingquan/www/ILAMB/Download/CODES/CODES/subroutines/convert/convert-NBCD2000.ncl Code 3: http://redwood.ess.uci.edu/mingquan/www/ILAMB/Download/CODES/CODES/subroutines/convert/write-NBCD2000.ncl First, I used Code 1 to read data at 250m from the original geotiff file; then I used Code 2 to convert unit from the orignal unit of ton C per hectare to the final one of Kg C per m2, meanwhile I summed all available data points at 250m in each 0.5x0.5 grid cell to obtain the data at 0.5x0.5 degree resolution; finally I used Code 3 to create the final file in netCDF format.
Temporal resolution: yearly
General information: This product was derived from National Biomass and Carbon Dataset for the year 2000 originally in a raster format at 250m.
Spatial resolution: 0.5x0.5 degree
Derived data code: http://redwood.ess.uci.edu/mingquan/www/ILAMB/Download/CODES/CODES/subroutines/convert/read-NBCD2000.pro http://redwood.ess.uci.edu/mingquan/www/ILAMB/Download/CODES/CODES/subroutines/convert/convert-NBCD2000.ncl http://redwood.ess.uci.edu/mingquan/www/ILAMB/Download/CODES/CODES/subroutines/convert/write-NBCD2000.ncl