Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 76.5 | ||||||||||
CESM2_1 | [-] | 62.8 | 59.0 | 3.98 | 76.1 | 0.362 | -5.36 | 0.579 | 0.564 | 0.571 | ||
CRUJRA | [-] | 196. | 180. | 15.5 | 76.1 | 0.362 | 39.1 | 0.355 | 0.122 | 0.239 | ||
GSWP3 | [-] | 99.3 | 89.3 | 9.84 | 76.1 | 0.362 | 5.79 | 0.533 | 0.297 | 0.415 | ||
PRINCETON | [-] | 297. | 283. | 15.4 | 76.1 | 0.362 | 75.7 | 0.289 | 0.0598 | 0.174 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 113. | ||||||||||
CESM2_1 | [-] | 149. | 90.7 | 54.8 | 113. | 0.00185 | -4.71 | 0.649 | 0.706 | 0.678 | ||
CRUJRA | [-] | 244. | 157. | 82.1 | 113. | 0.00185 | 8.93 | 0.602 | 0.824 | 0.713 | ||
GSWP3 | [-] | 134. | 70.8 | 60.0 | 113. | 0.00185 | -8.94 | 0.563 | 0.826 | 0.694 | ||
PRINCETON | [-] | 297. | 207. | 83.6 | 113. | 0.00185 | 19.5 | 0.534 | 0.436 | 0.485 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 12.2 | ||||||||||
CESM2_1 | [-] | 117. | 12.3 | 108. | 12.2 | 0.149 | 0.645 | 0.771 | 0.708 | |||
CRUJRA | [-] | 114. | 12.7 | 105. | 12.2 | 1.06 | 0.599 | 0.348 | 0.473 | |||
GSWP3 | [-] | 92.5 | 5.25 | 89.6 | 12.2 | -7.03 | 0.544 | 0.819 | 0.682 | |||
PRINCETON | [-] | 189. | 33.9 | 160. | 12.2 | 21.0 | 0.455 | 0.0537 | 0.254 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 97.3 | ||||||||||
CESM2_1 | [-] | 44.4 | 43.8 | 1.26 | 97.2 | 0.0996 | -16.8 | 0.468 | 0.585 | 0.526 | ||
CRUJRA | [-] | 200. | 187. | 15.6 | 97.2 | 0.0996 | 29.2 | 0.486 | 0.223 | 0.355 | ||
GSWP3 | [-] | 119. | 111. | 10.1 | 97.2 | 0.0996 | 4.67 | 0.549 | 0.396 | 0.472 | ||
PRINCETON | [-] | 209. | 193. | 17.5 | 97.2 | 0.0996 | 30.8 | 0.513 | 0.248 | 0.381 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 5.12 | ||||||||||
CESM2_1 | [-] | 36.5 | 1.64 | 34.4 | 5.12 | -13.0 | 0.492 | 0.316 | 0.404 | |||
CRUJRA | [-] | 59.9 | 4.22 | 54.8 | 5.12 | -3.42 | 0.669 | 0.669 | 0.669 | |||
GSWP3 | [-] | 44.4 | 3.44 | 40.2 | 5.12 | -6.39 | 0.638 | 0.667 | 0.652 | |||
PRINCETON | [-] | 57.7 | 4.03 | 52.8 | 5.12 | -4.16 | 0.666 | 0.542 | 0.604 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 475. | ||||||||||
CESM2_1 | [-] | 967. | 321. | 646. | 474. | 1.51 | -5.31 | 0.545 | 0.248 | 0.397 | ||
CRUJRA | [-] | 1.57e+03 | 785. | 786. | 474. | 1.51 | 14.6 | 0.509 | 0.355 | 0.432 | ||
GSWP3 | [-] | 1.05e+03 | 432. | 622. | 474. | 1.51 | -1.47 | 0.536 | 0.644 | 0.590 | ||
PRINCETON | [-] | 2.00e+03 | 1.12e+03 | 880. | 474. | 1.51 | 29.3 | 0.479 | 0.162 | 0.321 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 116. | ||||||||||
CESM2_1 | [-] | 100. | 75.9 | 25.4 | 116. | 0.373 | -2.93 | 0.481 | 0.127 | 0.304 | ||
CRUJRA | [-] | 201. | 189. | 12.4 | 116. | 0.373 | 13.9 | 0.491 | 0.352 | 0.421 | ||
GSWP3 | [-] | 123. | 115. | 7.52 | 116. | 0.373 | 0.679 | 0.493 | 0.628 | 0.561 | ||
PRINCETON | [-] | 350. | 336. | 14.9 | 116. | 0.373 | 38.4 | 0.469 | 0.0961 | 0.283 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 0.0131 | ||||||||||
CESM2_1 | [-] | 22.0 | 0.0151 | 21.6 | 0.0131 | 0.916 | 0.856 | 2.56e-22 | 0.428 | |||
CRUJRA | [-] | 38.3 | 0.0212 | 37.6 | 0.0131 | 3.66 | 0.537 | 1.53e-20 | 0.269 | |||
GSWP3 | [-] | 31.7 | 0.0173 | 31.0 | 0.0131 | 1.97 | 0.718 | 2.53e-23 | 0.359 | |||
PRINCETON | [-] | 39.5 | 0.0238 | 38.8 | 0.0131 | 4.87 | 0.438 | 1.37e-22 | 0.219 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 46.1 | ||||||||||
CESM2_1 | [-] | 58.5 | 29.8 | 28.5 | 46.1 | 0.00725 | -7.97 | 0.565 | 0.532 | 0.548 | ||
CRUJRA | [-] | 103. | 53.6 | 49.3 | 46.1 | 0.00725 | 3.27 | 0.599 | 0.867 | 0.733 | ||
GSWP3 | [-] | 74.8 | 35.8 | 39.3 | 46.1 | 0.00725 | -5.00 | 0.563 | 0.575 | 0.569 | ||
PRINCETON | [-] | 114. | 56.1 | 57.9 | 46.1 | 0.00725 | 4.43 | 0.596 | 0.870 | 0.733 |
Download Data |
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg] |
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg] |
Bias [kg m-2] |
Bias Score [1] |
Spatial Distribution Score [1] |
Overall Score [1] |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark | [-] | 0.232 | ||||||||||
CESM2_1 | [-] | 7.77 | 0.127 | 8.11 | 0.232 | -2.51 | 0.537 | 0.242 | 0.390 | |||
CRUJRA | [-] | 12.2 | 0.314 | 12.5 | 0.232 | 0.735 | 0.520 | 0.797 | 0.659 | |||
GSWP3 | [-] | 11.5 | 0.279 | 11.9 | 0.232 | 0.00841 | 0.527 | 0.797 | 0.662 | |||
PRINCETON | [-] | 17.3 | 0.629 | 17.4 | 0.232 | 5.63 | 0.534 | 0.565 | 0.549 |
Approach: I just read the data from the original data file and converted the latitude arrange from original 90N->90S to 90S->90N. The unit was convert from original 0.1 KgC/m2 to KgC/m2
Temporal resolution: yearly
General information: This product was derived from Northern Circumpolar Soil Carbon Database V2.2 (NCSCDv22) in top 1m.
Spatial resolution: 0.5x0.5 degree
Derived data code: http://redwood.ess.uci.edu/mingquan/www/ILAMB/Download/CODES/CODES/subroutines/convert/convert-soilc-NCSCDv22.ncl
history: Tue Mar 19 20:16:17 2019: ncrename -v soilc,cSoilAbove1m soilc_0.5x0.5.nc