Mean State

Download Data
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg]
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg]
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg]
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg]
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg]
Bias [kg m-2]
Bias Score [1]
Spatial Distribution Score [1]
Overall Score [1]
Benchmark [-] 30.1
CESM2_1_001 [-] 487. 16.4 470. 29.9 0.195 -1.17 0.538 0.679 0.609
CESM2_1_002 [-] 487. 16.5 471. 29.9 0.195 -1.16 0.538 0.683 0.610
CESM2_1_003 [-] 487. 16.5 470. 29.9 0.195 -1.16 0.537 0.680 0.608
CRUJRA [-] 626. 29.3 597. 29.9 0.195 0.327 0.605 0.837 0.721
GSWP3 [-] 491. 22.4 468. 29.9 0.195 -0.472 0.574 0.772 0.673
LENS1 [-] 552. 23.1 529. 29.9 0.195 -0.503 0.617 0.732 0.675
LENS10 [-] 552. 22.9 529. 29.9 0.195 -0.532 0.616 0.733 0.674
LENS5 [-] 554. 22.9 531. 29.9 0.195 -0.528 0.616 0.734 0.675
PRINCETON [-] 714. 35.9 678. 29.9 0.195 1.05 0.624 0.845 0.735
Download Data
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg]
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg]
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg]
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg]
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg]
Bias [kg m-2]
Bias Score [1]
Spatial Distribution Score [1]
Overall Score [1]
Benchmark [-] 1.44
CESM2_1_001 [-] 10.0 4.41 5.87 1.41 0.0279 2.74 0.350 0.574 0.462
CESM2_1_002 [-] 10.3 4.51 6.01 1.41 0.0279 2.82 0.339 0.566 0.453
CESM2_1_003 [-] 10.2 4.52 5.90 1.41 0.0279 2.83 0.339 0.572 0.456
CRUJRA [-] 16.4 6.21 10.1 1.41 0.0279 4.48 0.202 0.428 0.315
GSWP3 [-] 14.9 6.04 8.72 1.41 0.0279 4.24 0.200 0.465 0.333
LENS1 [-] 3.40 0.533 2.80 1.41 0.0279 -0.632 0.463 0.405 0.434
LENS10 [-] 3.37 0.527 2.78 1.41 0.0279 -0.638 0.462 0.398 0.430
LENS5 [-] 3.38 0.534 2.78 1.41 0.0279 -0.631 0.463 0.407 0.435
PRINCETON [-] 22.3 7.89 14.4 1.41 0.0279 5.90 0.131 0.239 0.185
Download Data
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg]
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg]
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg]
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg]
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg]
Bias [kg m-2]
Bias Score [1]
Spatial Distribution Score [1]
Overall Score [1]
Benchmark [-] 0.00649
CESM2_1_001 [-] 9.84 0.0204 9.59 0.00649 0.164 0.488 0.577 0.532
CESM2_1_002 [-] 9.95 0.0185 9.70 0.00649 0.146 0.482 0.562 0.522
CESM2_1_003 [-] 10.0 0.0192 9.76 0.00649 0.155 0.487 0.576 0.531
CRUJRA [-] 12.4 0.0314 12.1 0.00649 0.346 0.598 0.779 0.688
GSWP3 [-] 10.2 0.0247 9.96 0.00649 0.231 0.589 0.761 0.675
LENS1 [-] 13.9 0.0271 13.7 0.00649 0.218 0.416 0.273 0.344
LENS10 [-] 13.7 0.0247 13.4 0.00649 0.183 0.401 0.236 0.318
LENS5 [-] 13.7 0.0237 13.4 0.00649 0.174 0.402 0.216 0.309
PRINCETON [-] 13.7 0.0259 13.4 0.00649 0.253 0.586 0.761 0.673
Download Data
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg]
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg]
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg]
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg]
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg]
Bias [kg m-2]
Bias Score [1]
Spatial Distribution Score [1]
Overall Score [1]
Benchmark [-] 17.4
CESM2_1_001 [-] 9.53 9.25 0.198 17.3 0.0180 -1.66 0.605 0.845 0.725
CESM2_1_002 [-] 9.58 9.29 0.199 17.3 0.0180 -1.65 0.606 0.849 0.728
CESM2_1_003 [-] 9.50 9.22 0.197 17.3 0.0180 -1.67 0.604 0.845 0.725
CRUJRA [-] 18.0 17.6 0.300 17.3 0.0180 0.471 0.703 0.930 0.816
GSWP3 [-] 11.9 11.6 0.244 17.3 0.0180 -1.07 0.648 0.854 0.751
LENS1 [-] 18.8 18.2 0.339 17.3 0.0180 0.627 0.726 0.931 0.828
LENS10 [-] 18.6 18.0 0.335 17.3 0.0180 0.585 0.723 0.932 0.827
LENS5 [-] 18.6 18.1 0.340 17.3 0.0180 0.591 0.724 0.933 0.829
PRINCETON [-] 19.2 18.7 0.319 17.3 0.0180 0.762 0.695 0.925 0.810
Download Data
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg]
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg]
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg]
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg]
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg]
Bias [kg m-2]
Bias Score [1]
Spatial Distribution Score [1]
Overall Score [1]
Benchmark [-] 1.52
CESM2_1_001 [-] 35.2 1.15 33.8 1.46 0.0621 0.725 0.636 0.826 0.731
CESM2_1_002 [-] 35.5 1.15 34.1 1.46 0.0621 0.700 0.633 0.823 0.728
CESM2_1_003 [-] 35.3 1.15 34.0 1.46 0.0621 0.696 0.636 0.825 0.730
CRUJRA [-] 53.4 2.12 51.3 1.46 0.0621 5.19 0.612 0.905 0.759
GSWP3 [-] 44.5 1.76 42.9 1.46 0.0621 3.57 0.645 0.899 0.772
LENS1 [-] 13.4 0.499 13.1 1.46 0.0621 -3.65 0.394 0.377 0.386
LENS10 [-] 13.4 0.493 13.1 1.46 0.0621 -3.67 0.394 0.373 0.384
LENS5 [-] 13.5 0.505 13.2 1.46 0.0621 -3.62 0.394 0.383 0.388
PRINCETON [-] 67.0 2.48 64.6 1.46 0.0621 6.90 0.586 0.902 0.744
Download Data
Period Mean (original grids) [Pg]
Model Period Mean (intersection) [Pg]
Model Period Mean (complement) [Pg]
Benchmark Period Mean (intersection) [Pg]
Benchmark Period Mean (complement) [Pg]
Bias [kg m-2]
Bias Score [1]
Spatial Distribution Score [1]
Overall Score [1]
Benchmark [-] 9.78
CESM2_1_001 [-] 1.65 1.56 0.118 9.71 0.0683 -2.12 0.429 0.208 0.318
CESM2_1_002 [-] 1.66 1.56 0.114 9.71 0.0683 -2.12 0.430 0.207 0.318
CESM2_1_003 [-] 1.68 1.59 0.118 9.71 0.0683 -2.11 0.430 0.207 0.318
CRUJRA [-] 3.44 3.31 0.178 9.71 0.0683 -1.61 0.488 0.532 0.510
GSWP3 [-] 3.12 3.01 0.149 9.71 0.0683 -1.71 0.483 0.415 0.449
LENS1 [-] 4.01 3.83 0.248 9.71 0.0683 -1.55 0.478 0.117 0.297
LENS10 [-] 3.93 3.76 0.238 9.71 0.0683 -1.57 0.477 0.119 0.298
LENS5 [-] 3.93 3.76 0.235 9.71 0.0683 -1.57 0.476 0.113 0.295
PRINCETON [-] 6.93 6.74 0.219 9.71 0.0683 -0.669 0.574 0.785 0.679

Temporally integrated period mean

BENCHMARK MEAN
Data not available
Data not available
MODEL MEAN
Data not available
Data not available
BIAS
Data not available
Data not available
BIAS SCORE
Data not available
Data not available

Spatially integrated regional mean

MODEL COLORS
Data not available

All Models

Benchmark
Data not available
Data not available
CESM2_1_001
Data not available
Data not available
CESM2_1_002
Data not available
Data not available
CESM2_1_003
Data not available
Data not available
CRUJRA
Data not available
Data not available
GSWP3
Data not available
Data not available
LENS1
Data not available
Data not available
LENS10
Data not available
Data not available
LENS5
Data not available
Data not available
PRINCETON
Data not available
Data not available

Data Information

  Approach:
To convert the original data at 250m to the final one at 0.5x0.5 degree resolution, Please see conversion steps listed in http://redwood.ess.uci.edu/mingquan/www/ILAMB/Download/CODES/CODES/subroutines/convert/readme_biomass. 3 codes below will be used in these steps. Code 1: http://redwood.ess.uci.edu/mingquan/www/ILAMB/Download/CODES/CODES/subroutines/convert/read-US.Forest.pro Code 2: http://redwood.ess.uci.edu/mingquan/www/ILAMB/Download/CODES/CODES/subroutines/convert/convert-US.Forest.ncl Code 3: http://redwood.ess.uci.edu/mingquan/www/ILAMB/Download/CODES/CODES/subroutines/convert/write-US.Forest.ncl First, I used Code 1 to read data at 250m from the original geotiff file
then I used Code 2 to convert unit from the orignal unit of ton C per hectare to the final one of Kg C per m2, meanwhile I summed all available data points at 250m in each 0.5x0.5 grid cell to obtain the data at 0.5x0.5 degree resolution
finally I used Code 3 to create the final file in netCDF format.

  Temporal resolution:
yearly

  General information:
This product was derived from Forest Biomass across the Lower 48 States and Alaska originally in a raster format at 250m.

  Spatial resolution:
0.5x0.5 degree

  Derived data code:
http://redwood.ess.uci.edu/mingquan/www/ILAMB/Download/CODES/CODES/subroutines/convert/read-US.Forest.pro http://redwood.ess.uci.edu/mingquan/www/ILAMB/Download/CODES/CODES/subroutines/convert/convert-US.Forest.ncl http://redwood.ess.uci.edu/mingquan/www/ILAMB/Download/CODES/CODES/subroutines/convert/write-US.Forest.ncl